Sepp Blatter, Michel Platini expected to get long bans from football - report
Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini are likely to escape lifetime bans for corruption but investigators expect the pair to receive lengthy suspensions of at least seven years when their hearings take place this week, Press Association Sport reports citing insiders at FIFA.
Blatter and Platini will have disciplinary hearings before FIFA ethics judge Hans-Joachim Eckert in Zurich on Thursday and Friday, over a two million Swiss franc (£1.3m) payment made to Platini by world football's governing body in 2011 and signed off by Blatter.
FIFA IN CRISIS
- FIFA ban Blatter, Platini for eight years | Beckham
- Sixteen more indicted in FIFA corruption inquiry
- Two more FIFA officials arrested | Hayatou on reforms
- FIFA Executive Committee from 2010 - where are they now?
- EXCLUSIVE: FIFA probe could take five years - Swiss AG
- Amnesty slams FIFA, Qatar over workers | Dyke angry
- FIFA opens Blatter, Platini proceedings | Blatter nearly died
- Five candidates in running for FIFA | Blatter exits hospital
- Warner denies Beckenbauer agreement | Rummenigge
- Timeline of corruption | FIFA's ugly game | 538 on FIFA
Outgoing FIFA president Blatter and UEFA president Platini face charges including corruption, conflict of interest and non-cooperation. Sources with knowledge of the case say that it will be difficult to prove corruption, which carries a lifetime ban, but believe there is clear evidence of a conflict of interest in the payment being made.
That should carry a ban of at least seven years, but it is likely any suspension for wrongdoing will effectively end their careers in football politics.
Blatter's case will be heard on Thursday with Platini's following on Friday. A decision is expected to be announced by Monday next week.
The pair say the payment, made to Platini in February 2011, was honouring an agreement made in 1998 for work carried out between 1998 and 2002 when Platini worked as a technical advisor for the FIFA president.
However, the payment was not part of Platini's written contract -- they have insisted that it was an oral agreement which is legal under Swiss law.
The timing of the payment has raised eyebrows however -- it took place nine years after Platini had stopped working for FIFA, and was made while Blatter was seeking support for a fourth term as president. Several weeks after the payment was made Platini and UEFA's executive committee endorsed his candidacy.
Both Platini and Blatter have denied any wrongdoing -- Platini has said he had not been paid the full amount agreed in 1998 because of FIFA's financial situation at the time.
South Korea's former FIFA vice-president Chung Mong-Joon was banned for six years in October for conflict of interest and non-cooperation -- the latter offence can simply be having publicly criticised the FIFA ethics committee. Chung's case would appear however to be less serious than that facing Blatter and Platini.
Blatter and Platini are likely to challenge any ban and take the case all the way to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Meanwhile, FIFA has appointed Harvard professor John Ruggie to provide recommendations on a new human rights policy that will cover future World Cup hosts.
The appointment follows several reports criticising worker rights in 2022 hosts Qatar and Ruggie will make his proposals in March.
THE BEST OF ESPN FC
- Bell: Liverpool fans make themselves heard
- Cox: Leicester improving | Why Poch should stay
- Okwonga: Man United's market | City's title hopes
- Laurens: PSG's pre-UCL issues | Hertha's curse
- Highlights (U.S. only): Stuttgart 1-3 BVB
- FC TV: Champions League W2W4 | LVG wrong
- News | Transfer | Toe Poke | Fantasy | FC TV | Podcast | MLS
The former Trinidad and Tobago international went to CAS after his bid to run for the top FIFA post was turned down in October when the world governing body's electoral committee found that he had not presented declarations of support from at least five member associations.
He was rejected on the grounds that one national association nominated both Nakhid and another candidate.
A CAS statement on Monday read: "In line with the FIFA AEC, the CAS Panel found that one member association had issued declarations of support to two candidates, including one for Mr Nakhid, in violation of the applicable FIFA rules.
"As a consequence, those letters of support were disregarded, meaning that David Nakhid had not met the qualifying criterion of obtaining declarations of support from at least five member associations, and accordingly, his candidature could not be validated."